Is Michigan trying to avoid the same type of rift that opened at Penn State over the Paterno legacy? Or do they just believe that what happened with Anderson etc is not a big deal?
To me, it doesn't seem like they've ever reckoned with just how valuable a compromised doctor would be to a football coach, or how many different ways that would infect a program/department.
I don't understand the big picture here.
Is Michigan trying to avoid the same type of rift that opened at Penn State over the Paterno legacy? Or do they just believe that what happened with Anderson etc is not a big deal?
To me, it doesn't seem like they've ever reckoned with just how valuable a compromised doctor would be to a football coach, or how many different ways that would infect a program/department.
There's a donor class there, for one thing, that is very protective of Bo's legacy. Similar in that way to Penn State.