Like a good yinzer Alex knows puck. Beating Canada in my opinion will come down to a Hellybuck in net. When he’s on (and not playing behind Winnipegs D) he can stop anything.
I just don't think the US team was built very well. I think Guerin and Sullivan overdid it with trying to be "hard to play against" and didn't try to put the most skilled possible team on the ice.
Same thing happened to me during the 2015 World Series. Went to a "sports bar" with the fellas to watch the Royals win it. They wouldn't turn on the sound because it was trivia night lol.
My guess is that Sac State is taking the buy rate for a 30 second ad and multiplying it by the number of minutes that they would be on TV, the same way that a McNeese State claims that it gets $40 million in free advertising by winning a game in the NCAA Tournament. The obvious flaw in that math is the notion that many people watching an NCAA tournament game aren't interested in going to college anymore since most viewers are older than college aged, and a very small percentage are considering McNeese State among their options.
Listening to this episode right now and the talk about eligibility has me wondering what eligibility in a “players are employees” world looks like.
What stops college football from just becoming a minor pro league and having no eligibility rules? What’s stopping teams from keeping good players who won’t be nfl players for 7-10 years? What happens to development of high school kids coming to college?
I realize this is more than a quick answer, but would be intrigued on looking in to a potential future at what it could look like.
Like a good yinzer Alex knows puck. Beating Canada in my opinion will come down to a Hellybuck in net. When he’s on (and not playing behind Winnipegs D) he can stop anything.
I just don't think the US team was built very well. I think Guerin and Sullivan overdid it with trying to be "hard to play against" and didn't try to put the most skilled possible team on the ice.
As a stars fan… yeah if we get shutout or something people are gonna rage no geekie and robo or caulfield
Same thing happened to me during the 2015 World Series. Went to a "sports bar" with the fellas to watch the Royals win it. They wouldn't turn on the sound because it was trivia night lol.
very tough!
Great episode. And an incredible day of Olympic hockey.
We recorded a new episode for subscribers for tomorrow and took multiple hockey breaks in the middle of it.
My guess is that Sac State is taking the buy rate for a 30 second ad and multiplying it by the number of minutes that they would be on TV, the same way that a McNeese State claims that it gets $40 million in free advertising by winning a game in the NCAA Tournament. The obvious flaw in that math is the notion that many people watching an NCAA tournament game aren't interested in going to college anymore since most viewers are older than college aged, and a very small percentage are considering McNeese State among their options.
ironic to listen to the talk about 'economic impact' as the news of the Bears stadium breaks.
Listening to this episode right now and the talk about eligibility has me wondering what eligibility in a “players are employees” world looks like.
What stops college football from just becoming a minor pro league and having no eligibility rules? What’s stopping teams from keeping good players who won’t be nfl players for 7-10 years? What happens to development of high school kids coming to college?
I realize this is more than a quick answer, but would be intrigued on looking in to a potential future at what it could look like.
In theory, a court or Congress or shame would stop it.
IMO
Pavia is still in this eligibility suit because I think he’s going to try and come back if he goes later than the 4th round
Mannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn. Man.
Who better and loudest person to be the cfb person to try this.